Write for Us

Write for CamoCrypt

CamoCrypt (camocrypt.com) publishes crypto security and education content that people rely on when real money is at stake. We accept a small number of expert contributions each month from people who genuinely understand how crypto works and how it goes wrong — security researchers, wallet and protocol engineers, incident responders, compliance and policy specialists, educators, and experienced self-custody users who can explain hard things simply. If that is you, this page tells you exactly what we publish, what we do not, and how to pitch so your work gets read.

This is a genuine contributor programme, not a paid-link marketplace. We do not sell placements, we do not run sponsored “guest posts,” and we do not trade dofollow links for content. What we offer instead is a credible, security-focused home for careful work, a transparent editorial process, and a proper author credit. If you are looking to buy a backlink, this is not the page for you — and we would rather tell you that up front than waste your time.

Who we are looking for

Our readers are holding real assets and often arrive mid-problem. That raises the bar: we want contributors who can be trusted to give instructions that are correct, because a wrong step in crypto is frequently irreversible. Strong contributors usually have one or more of the following:

• Direct security experience — you have investigated wallet drainers, reverse-engineered a phishing kit, audited smart contracts, or handled real incident response, and you can write about it without hype.
• Engineering depth — you build wallets, nodes, protocols, or tooling, and can explain a mechanism (approvals, signatures, bridges, mempools) so a non-engineer understands both how it works and where the risk lives.
• Policy or compliance fluency — you work in regulation, AML/KYC, or tax, and can turn a framework into plain education without drifting into advice.
• Teaching ability — you may not have a famous title, but you can take a genuinely confusing topic and make it click, with accurate detail and no filler.

You do not need to be a public name. You do need to know your subject well enough that our editors — who check every procedure against primary sources — will not find errors. Demonstrated expertise beats credentials on paper.

How CamoCrypt differs from other “write for us” crypto pages

Search “crypto write for us” or “cryptocurrency write for us” and you will find hundreds of pages. Most are link farms: they invite “guest posts,” quietly charge a placement fee, and publish almost anything with a dofollow link stitched into the second paragraph. That model is why so much crypto content online is unreliable, and why readers who are trying to stay safe cannot tell guidance from advertising.

CamoCrypt is deliberately the opposite. We publish few pieces, we fact-check all of them, and we take no money to run them. The trade is simple and it is stated plainly on this page: you bring genuine expertise and accept a rigorous edit; we give you a credible, permanent home for the work and a real author credit. If that trade does not appeal — if what you actually want is a cheap backlink — a link farm will serve you faster, and we would rather you use one than pitch us. Everyone’s time is better spent when expectations are honest from the first email.

Topics we accept

We commission and accept work across the same five clusters that structure the site. The best pitches are specific: not “crypto security,” but “how address-poisoning attacks trick people into copying the wrong wallet, and the two habits that defeat them.”

• Security — attack anatomies (drainers, approval abuse, phishing, social engineering, SIM-swap, malware), defensive how-tos, and incident-response walkthroughs. This is our flagship area and where we most want depth.
• How it works — clear mechanical explainers: keys and signatures, how a transaction is built and broadcast, gas and fees, consensus basics, mempool behaviour.
• Wallets & custody — hardware wallet setup and threat models, seed-phrase and passphrase hygiene, multisig, verifying that an app is genuine, migrating custody safely.
• DeFi mechanics — what a contract interaction actually authorises, how approvals and permits work, how bridges and pools function, and where users get hurt. Mechanics and risk only.
• Regulation — plain-English summaries of how a jurisdiction treats crypto, framed as education. Never legal or tax advice.

We also welcome strong glossary contributions — tight, accurate definitions of terms readers meet in the wild.

Topics and angles we will not publish

Our exclusions are the reason readers trust us, so they are firm and they apply to contributors exactly as they apply to staff:

• No prices, predictions, or “best coin / best exchange” content. We do not tell readers what to buy, hold, or sell.
• No token, project, exchange, or product promotion, and no thinly disguised advertorial.
• No trading strategies, signals, yield-chasing, or airdrop-farming guides.
• No “recovery service” content. Up-front-fee fund recovery is a second scam; we will not host, endorse, or soft-pedal it.
• No financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Education explains how things work; it does not tell an individual what to do with their money.
• No fabricated data, fake case studies, invented statistics, or unverifiable claims.

If a pitch depends on any of the above to be interesting, it is not a fit for CamoCrypt.

Our editorial standards

Because a mistaken instruction can cost a reader their savings, our standards are stricter than most publications’, and we will not relax them for a submission that is otherwise well written.

• Everything is verifiable. Procedures must be checkable against primary sources — protocol specs and standards, official wallet/hardware documentation, or recognised authorities (for example IC3, Action Fraud, FinCEN, FATF, national tax bodies). Cite them.
• No unverifiable numbers. If you cannot source a statistic to a primary or clearly named reference, leave it out. We would rather have fewer numbers than a wrong one.
• Security instructions must be exact. Commands, steps, and warnings have to be technically correct and safe to follow literally. Ambiguity is a defect.
• Plain language. Define jargon on first use, prefer short sentences, and assume an intelligent reader who is not a specialist.
• Original work only. No plagiarism, no spun content, no republishing something already live elsewhere. Your piece must be exclusive to CamoCrypt.
• Sources listed. Every substantive article ends with the references it relied on.

A note on AI-assisted drafts

We are not dogmatic about tools, and we use AI assistance ourselves. You may use AI to help draft, but you are fully responsible for accuracy: AI routinely invents plausible-sounding commands, statistics, and citations, and in a security context that is dangerous. If you submit AI-assisted work, you must have personally verified every factual claim, every instruction, and every source against a primary reference. Submissions that read as unedited machine output — vague, padded, or citing sources that do not say what is claimed — are rejected regardless of topic.

Formatting and length

Meeting the format below makes acceptance far more likely and speeds up editing:

• Length: most pieces run 1,200–2,500 words. Go longer only if the topic genuinely needs it. Depth beats padding.
• Structure: a clear H1 title, descriptive H2/H3 subheadings, and short paragraphs. Lead with the answer where you can — many readers arrive from search and from AI assistants looking for a direct response.
• Quick answer: open with a two-to-four sentence summary a reader (or an AI overview) could lift as a standalone answer.
• Key points: include three to six takeaway bullets.
• Sources: a linked reference list at the end, primary sources preferred.
• Media: diagrams and screenshots are welcome if you have the rights to them; redact any real addresses, keys, or personal data.
• No live seed phrases, private keys, or real victim data, ever, even as an example. Use obvious placeholders.

Links and author credit

Here is our honest policy on the thing most contributors ask about. CamoCrypt does not sell links and does not offer guaranteed dofollow backlinks in exchange for content. In-body links are added only where they genuinely help the reader, at the editor’s discretion, and may be nofollow. Every published contributor receives a proper author credit with a short bio and, where relevant, one link to your professional profile or site. If your primary goal is SEO link equity rather than reaching readers, we are not the right venue, and we say so plainly so nobody feels misled.

Examples of pitches that get a yes

The difference between an accepted pitch and a rejected one is almost always specificity and evidence. Here is the shape of pitches that tend to work:

• “How a fake transaction-simulation popup convinces people a drainer is safe — and the one detail in the wallet UI that gives it away.” Narrow, mechanism-led, defensive, and clearly written by someone who has actually seen the attack.
• “What ‘increase allowance’ really authorises when you approve a token, why unlimited approvals are the default, and how to set and check a finite allowance.” A concrete mechanic most holders half-understand, with an actionable defence.
• “Setting up a hardware wallet passphrase (the ’25th word’): the threat model it does and does not protect against, and the mistake that locks people out forever.” Advanced, honest about limits, and safety-critical.
• “How MiCA classifies stablecoins, in plain English, and what changes for an ordinary EU holder — as education, not advice.” Regulation done as explanation, with a jurisdiction and a clear boundary.

What these share: a single, well-scoped question; a mechanism explained rather than asserted; a defensive payoff for the reader; and an author who can cite primary sources.

Examples of pitches that get a no

Just as useful is knowing what we turn down almost on sight, so you do not spend effort on a piece we cannot run:

• “Top 10 coins to watch this cycle” or anything price-, prediction-, or portfolio-led.
• “Why [Exchange] is the best place to buy crypto in 2025” — promotion and affiliate content dressed as a guide.
• “How I recovered $40,000 from a scammer using [Service]” — recovery-service marketing, which we treat as a second scam.
• Generic, sourceless overviews — “What is blockchain?” with nothing new, no primary sources, and no security angle.
• Pitches that lead with the backlink — “I’ll write 800 words for a dofollow link to my exchange.” That is the paid-link model we do not run.

None of these are personal; they simply collide with the exclusions that make CamoCrypt worth reading.

How your work is optimised for search, AEO and AI overviews

A good security article is worth little if the person who needs it never finds it, so we structure every piece — yours included — to be discoverable by both search engines and the AI systems that increasingly summarise answers. This is part of the editorial value we add, and it is worth understanding before you write.

• Answer-first structure. We lead with a concise, self-contained answer to the article’s core question. This “quick answer” is what a Google AI Overview, an AI assistant, or a featured snippet can quote directly, and it is what a worried reader reads first. Write your draft the same way: state the answer, then explain it.
• Question-shaped headings. Real people and AI systems both search in questions. Clear H2/H3 subheadings phrased the way someone would actually ask (“What is a token approval?”, “How do I revoke it?”) help your work surface in answer engines.
• Structured data. Our platform emits schema.org markup automatically — Article, HowTo for step-by-step procedures, DefinedTerm for glossary entries, and FAQ for question sections — so machines can parse your content’s structure, not just its words. You do not need to add markup; you need to write in the clean structure that lets us apply it.
• Genuine expertise and sourcing (E-E-A-T). Search and AI systems increasingly reward experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trust. Your author credit, your demonstrated experience, and the primary sources you cite are not box-ticking — they are what makes the work rank and, more importantly, what makes it safe to rely on.
• Internal linking. We connect your article to the relevant pillar guides and glossary terms so it sits inside a coherent topic cluster rather than floating alone, which helps both readers and crawlers understand it in context.

The happy accident here is that the things that make content rank in the AI era — a clear answer, honest sourcing, real expertise, clean structure — are exactly the things that make security content trustworthy. We are not gaming anything; we are writing well and letting the structure do the rest.

A pre-submission checklist

Before you send a pitch or a commissioned draft, run through this. It is the same checklist our editors use:

• Is the topic specific, and does it help someone protect real assets?
• Does it avoid every item on our exclusions list (prices, promotion, signals, recovery services, advice)?
• Can every factual claim and every instruction be traced to a primary source?
• Have you removed or replaced any statistic you could not verify?
• Are there any real seed phrases, private keys, or personal data anywhere? (There must not be — use placeholders.)
• Does it open with a clear, quotable answer and use question-shaped headings?
• Is it original, exclusive to CamoCrypt, and free of undisclosed conflicts of interest?
• Would you be comfortable if a non-technical friend followed these steps literally, with money on the line?

If you can answer yes to all of these, your pitch is already in the top tier of what we receive.

How to pitch

We work pitch-first. Please do not send a finished article cold; a tight pitch saves us both time and gets you a faster answer.

1. Send the idea, not the essay. In a few sentences, tell us the specific topic, the angle, why it matters to someone protecting real assets, and what makes you the right person to write it.
2. Show relevant expertise. Link to prior work, a profile, a repo, research, or anything that demonstrates you know the subject. If you have none public, tell us how you know what you know.
3. Name your sources. List the primary references you would build the piece on. This is often the fastest signal of whether a piece will meet our bar.
4. Confirm it is original and exclusive. The work must not be published elsewhere.

Send pitches through our contact page. Please use a clear subject line so it does not get lost, and pitch one idea at a time — a focused pitch always beats a list of ten.

What happens after you pitch

Here is the process end to end, so there are no surprises:

• Response. We read every pitch that meets these guidelines and aim to reply within a couple of weeks. If we pass, it is usually about fit or overlap with something we already cover — not a judgement of you.
• Brief. If we say yes, we will agree the angle, scope, rough length, and a target for the draft, and point you at any existing articles you should link to.
• Draft. You write it to the standards above and send it with your sources.
• Edit. Our editors fact-check every claim and instruction against primary sources. Expect questions, requests for citations, and edits for clarity and house style. Security accuracy is non-negotiable; if a step cannot be verified, it will be changed or cut.
• Publish. Once it meets the bar, we publish it under your author credit, and it becomes part of the permanent library. We may update it over time to keep it accurate, and we will keep your credit on it.

Rights and terms

Contributions are published exclusively on CamoCrypt. You keep credit as the author; you grant us the right to publish, edit for accuracy and style, and maintain the piece over time, including future corrections and updates. Because our readers depend on current, correct instructions, we reserve the right to revise or, in rare cases, unpublish content that becomes unsafe or inaccurate. We do not pay for contributions, and we do not charge for them — this is an editorial programme, not a transaction in either direction. By pitching, you confirm the work is your own, original, and free of undisclosed conflicts of interest such as a stake in a project you are writing about.

Why contribute to CamoCrypt

If your goal is to help ordinary people stop losing money to avoidable mistakes, this is a place where careful work is treated with respect. Your piece sits in a focused, security-first library rather than a churn of price posts; it is edited by people who check the facts rather than rubber-stamp them; and it carries your name in front of an audience that is reading precisely because the stakes are real. For researchers and builders, that is often worth more than a link: it is a credible, permanent reference you can point people to. If that is the kind of contribution you want to make, we would like to hear from you.